The Ballad of Buster Scruggs.

The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is technically a movie – it was released to theaters, and is also on Netflix as a single, 135-minute … well, movie. But it’s also kind of not a movie: it’s an anthology of six stories that have nothing in common beyond their settings, the American West of the frontier period, and the fact that Joel and Ethan Coen wrote and directed all of them. As you might find with any short story anthology, this sextet has highs and lows; the longest story here is the least interesting and perhaps worst acted, while there are also some truly brilliant moments comparable to the best work the Coens have done.

The first story bears the title of the whole film, and it’s short, silly, and establishes the theme that runs throughout the entire anthology – fate does not care for your narratives. You may take this as meaning the universe is random, or simply that man proposes, God disposes, but regardless, the Coens revel here in setting up one story only to take a right turn at the conclusion. Buster Scruggs is a sharp-shooting, fast-talking outlaw, prone to hifalutin vocabulary and expressing himself through song, a bad guy who enjoys killing worse guys and then singing over their corpses. He’s utterly ridiculous except that he’s good enough to shoot off a man’s trigger finger at a significant distance, until, of course, he meets someone a bit quicker.

The six films are all pretty dark, even when they’re very funny, and only one has anything you might consider a ‘happy’ ending. Tom Waits appears in the fourth story as a lonely goldpanner who spends days digging in a bucolic riverside spot to find the vein he believes is there, only to learn he’s been followed by a jumper with a pistol. What follows turns the narrative on its head and then flips it back again, although all of the story takes a back seat to the gorgeous scenery, which reminded me of the incredible landscape shots from the Coens’ remake of True Grit.

The worst of the six, by far, is set on the Oregon Trail, where Zoe Kazan plays a young woman traveling with her mansplaining brother to Oregon, where he’ll start a business and she’s due to be married to his business partner. He dies rather early in the trip, which is no great loss to the viewer, leaving the story to focus on the travails of a young woman left on her own on the caravan with no one to help her but a hired boy she may not be able to pay. The plot itself fits the broader themes of the anthology, but Kazan looks and especially sounds completely out of place here. I thought she was the weak link in The Big Sick, and I think she’s even more of a problem here, only adding value because she’s little and that helps emphasize the helpless nature of her character.

That leads into the concluding story, a gothic horror story set on a stagecoach at night, the one part of the film that feels like a play and by far the portion of this anthology that boasts the best cast, including Tyne Daly and Brendan Gleeson as two of five travelers on the coach. As they talk and argue, telling bits of their life stories, it becomes less clear that the passengers understand where they are going – and, to the Coens’ great credit, it isn’t clear at the end of the story, either.

Aside from the uneven nature of The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, which is inevitable for any set of six mini-films, the anthology suffers from how few real female characters it has in the film. Four of the stories have none; the last two have one each, Kazan’s and Daly’s, and the latter, while probably my favorite performance in the entire movie, shares screen time with four other actors all kind of having the times of their lives. (There’s a little surprise for Major League fans in this segment, but I won’t ruin it.) I could understand an argument that a movie set in the Old West would likely have few women in an authentic plot, but six different stories, only one revolves around a woman, and she’s not very strong at all. In a year where most of the best films had women at or near the hearts of their plots, the lack thereof in this film stands out as a real weakness.

Comments

  1. I still have this in my Top 10 list for the year…so far, that is, as I have a few significant titles yet to watch. The first segment literally had me laughing till there were tears in my eyes. Some of the means of disposal, if you will, particularly the loose table slat, were just too hysterical despite their relative gruesomeness. I thought the film was pretty well acted in all parts, and while I’m not as down on Kazan as you were, I will agree she did feel at least a bit out of place. I also agree that it was a very good choice for them to not be explicit about the ending. My dad and I debated for a good five minutes or so as the credits rolled as to what would actually happen once the door closed. There were rumors that this was supposed to have been a TV series as opposed to a film, but I’m not sure which parts would have been in the series or not. I could certainly watch a full season following the travails of Buster Scruggs and be well entertained.

  2. In addition to this film’s…weakness…when it comes to women (often a problem in Coen films), its representations of American Indians as little more than thoughtless, terrorizing savages has no place in 2018. I was very disappointed by this film, both because of these issues of representation, and also because I didn’t think the stories were terribly compelling.

  3. The representation issues were an annoyance…the framing device of the stories being taken from an old book (and would thus depict the representations therein) didn’t quite get there for me. Despite that, I enjoyed most of the stories, particularly the stagecoach and Tom Waits stories. I thought Zoe Kazan’s out-of-placeness enhanced the vulnerability of her situation, and her flirtation with the wagon train (what…driver? assistant conductor?) was convincing and tragic. I’ll say I’ve about had my fill of Tim Blake Nelson.