First Man.

First Man reunites director Damien Chazelle and Ryan Gosling, who worked together two years ago on La La Land, in a different sort of movie, this time a serious biopic that deals with the biggest themes possible – life, death, and man’s search for meaning. Ostensibly a biography of Neil Armstrong from the death of his young daughter from cancer to his landing on the moon, First Man is much more a story of grief and coping, or not coping, and as a result less insightful as any sort of document of the man himself.

Gosling plays Armstrong, whom we first meet as an engineer and Navy pilot whose two-year-old daughter Karen is seriously ill with a brain tumor that will claim her life (via daughter) very early in the film, after which Armstrong shows the only real emotion he will display anywhere during the course of the movie. The story follows him through his entry into the space program, flight testing, and training, eventually to his selection for Apollo 11, but his path involves living through the deaths of at least five colleagues due to crashes and the cabin fire on the Apollo 1 craft, only furthering Armstrong’s turn inward with its constant reminder of Karen’s death. Armstrong also distances himself from his wife, Janet (Claire Foy), and two young sons, burying himself in work rather than risking further grief by getting too close to anyone else in his life.

First Man is extremely loud and incredibly close, to the point where the sound editing and cinematography, while perhaps accurate for the subject matter, make it hard to watch in several parts. The scenes aboard the various spacecraft involve a tremendous amount of shaking – not just showing us that the people on the ships are shaking, but shaking the camera so much that I repeatedly had to turn away from the screen, something I can’t remember ever doing for another film. The sound in those scenes where Armstrong is aboard any sort of ship is also mixed so that the background noise is amplified and it’s very hard to understand any of the communications between Armstrong (and any colleagues) and Mission Control; I eventually just gave up on understanding that dialogue, much of which involved technical chatter.

Gosling and Foy dominate the movie both in screen time and with their performances, with Gosling making Armstrong almost unknowable with his restrained portrayal, at times painful in his reticence and utter refusal to show emotion. There’s a pivotal scene where Janet forces him to talk to his two sons before he leaves for the Apollo 11 mission, knowing there was a good chance he wouldn’t return, and he can barely talk to the boys or even look at them; when one son asks if he might not come home, Armstrong responds as if he’s still in a press conference, with Gosling barely making eye contact and answering with a robotic tone and cadence. Foy gets to show a broader range of emotions, and her character develops some strength over the course of the film, enhanced by how her character is dressed and Foy’s own waifish appearance.

The movie has disappointed at the box office – much to the glee of alt-right trolls upset over the absence of a scene where the American flag is planted on the moon, which would be so out of place given the context of what Armstrong actually does after he lands – and I think one reason might be that the movie isn’t just a biopic. There is some celebration of space exploration here, and certainly some jingoism involved as the U.S. reached the moon before the Soviets could, but the larger theme in First Man is death and how we cope with it. The script’s premise is that Karen’s death changed Armstrong forever, leading him to create distance between himself and his family while driving him to take bigger risks at work, including accepting the riskiest mission in the history of the space program. (As a side note, I enjoyed watching Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and The Pin flying to the moon.) Rather than fully explaining his character, though, the script instead shows a man unwilling to open up to anyone in his grief, and the damage that ultimately does to him, to his marriage, and to his relationships with his two surviving children. Perhaps audiences wanted to see more of a hero at the heart of the film – there are a few such moments, but it’s not the dominant tone – and were surprised to see a movie that is so somber and pensive about a topic just about nobody wants to spend any time considering. That theme, and that choice to go with that theme over a rah-rah space and ‘merica tone, makes First Man a stronger film even if it’s less commercially appealing.

Comments

  1. I don’t know; I feel a little like interpreting great accomplishments as being explained by some personal tragedy IS a conventional biopic move.

    For example, it might be the biggest thing wrong with Bohemian Rhapsody. You mentioned in your chat that you heard it was bad, but if you just want a lightweight tribute to the awesomeness of Queen that feels half like a music video (the dramatic conclusion of the film is the legendary Live Aid performance) it’s fine and I enjoyed it. But it shows the reunion and performance there as a product of Mercury getting his AIDS diagnosis. In real life it didn’t come to two years later, and needing an explanation like that feels like it robs him of the credit he deserves for just being a great performer.

  2. I spent my childhood wanting to be an astronaut and really enjoyed, “The Right Stuff” so I was purposely avoiding this movie, its trailers and the media surrounding it because I didn’t want it to be good. We had a babysitter for our kids one night and I was able to convince my wife into watching Gosling for a few hours so we decided to give it a shot.

    My oldest is a girl and this movie shook me in the theater and for the days that followed. You are right in that it’s not as much about space exploration or the hubris of man as much as it is about death and dealing with grief. Not just about with your children but also with friends and friends that are pretty much family.

  3. As I mentioned in my comment on your review for A Star Is Born, I generally feel like this is one of the stronger films I’ve seen so far this year, and yet I’m very conflicted about it. In some ways, I guess I was expecting (or hoping?) for a newer version of Apollo 13. This film is not that at all. Then the trailers got me thinking that the character of Janet Armstrong was an ungrateful shrew who objected to her husband being in the space program just because he might die. I didn’t know about Armstrong’s daughter, and as you said there’s much more to her character motivations than just not wanting her husband to die. I feel that this film could best be described as a character study where you don’t learn a lot about the character being studied, but are forced to accept him as is. I can’t help but feeling a little put off by that, as if we (the audience) just have to deal with Armstrong’s coldness and distance. Maybe there’s a comment about the coldness and distance of space in there?

    I feel like the film was much more a technical achievement than a storytelling success. But I definitely share your feelings about the sound in some of those scenes, and especially the shaky cam, At one point I leaned over to my dad and say, “I didn’t think this was going to turn into a Bourne movie.” He didn’t get the joke, so I had to explain it to him afterward. But, seriously, did we need shaky cam to follow Janet Armstrong as she crossed the street to make sure the one widow was OK as she stood frozen in her driveway? Too…much…shaky cam.

    I still have it in my top 4 or 5 for the year, so far, but I have a feeling that will change as more Oscar contenders start playing.

  4. Heading into this movie, I realized how strange it is that we seem to know so little about Neil Armstrong. Coming out of this movie I’m not sure we know much more. So, maybe the movie accurately depicts the man.

    One of the things I was most curious to see in the above review was whether the shaky-cam perspective would be mentioned. It was really bothersome; almost nauseating. Maybe it makes sense for the space flight, but, as mentioned by Pat D. above, it was beyond ridiculous in the crossing the street scene. The shakiest scene in the movie was the walk across the street.